May Not Fiction Book Discussions

If you love food and salty, spicy, sweet coming-of-age stories, then Blood, Bones & Butter: The Inadvertent Education of a Reluctant Chef by Gabrielle Hamilton is the memoir for you.

Hamilton is the chef/owner of the acclaimed restaurant Prune in New York's East Village. She also received an MFA in fiction writing from the University of Michigan, and her work has appeared in The New Yorker, The New York Times, GQ, Bon Appetit, Saveur, and Food & Wine. Before these accomplishments, Hamilton spent twenty hard-living and hard-working years trying to find purpose and meaning in her life after her family fell apart when her parents divorced when she was in her early teens.

With honesty and humor, she describes the many kitchens that helped her become the chef and woman she is today: the rural kitchen of her French mother; her many jobs bussing and waiting tables, including an underage stint as a cocktail waitress at the Lone Star Cafe in Manhattan; the kitchens of France, Greece, and Turkey where she was often fed by strangers as she spent two years traveling; the soulless corporate kitchens of large New York catering companies where she learned her craft; her own kitchen at Prune; and the kitchen of her Italian mother-in-law, who is the true center of her conflicted marriage. 

Running through the narrative is her poignant search for family, inextricably intertwined with her passion for simple, nourishing food. As Frank Bruni, former restaurant critic for The New York Times, says, Blood, Bones & Butter is "a story of hungers specific and vague, conquered and unappeasable"--the perfect ingredients of a chef memoir.

A challenge for every writer of a memoir is which details from one's life to include and which to leave out, which contribute to a clear narrative and theme, and which do not. Add to this the difficulty we all have of finding perspective on the most recent events of our lives. Does Hamilton satisfy your hunger for a satisfying narrative arc rich with significant detail and tempered with dispassionate perspective? Or do parts of her memoir feel, well, uncooked?

We hope you will join the discussion of this book that Anthony Bourdain calls, "Simply the best memoir by a chef ever. Ever.": Tuesday, May 1, at 6:30 p.m. at Main Library; Thursday, May 17, at 11:00 a.m. at West Ashley Branch Library; and here on the blog.

Click here to view the menu at Prune!

April Not Fiction Book Discussions

Last month, Stacy Schiff helped us see Cleopatra, the woman and the ruler, with fresh eyes and not a little respect and admiration for her leadership skills. This month, we will be reading about another woman who has created a remarkably successful life and career in Bossypants by Tina Fey . Comedian and writer Fey delivers a laugh-out-loud series of sketches about childhood, parenthood, womanhood, and being the boss, and she describes her experiences performing improv with Chicago's Second City, writing and performing for Saturday Night Live, and creating and starring in the television series 30 Rock.

In an interview with the New York Times, Fey admitted that she found writing the book to be an unexpected challenge, saying the process "was a much higher, steeper roller coaster" than other projects. "I kept saying, 'This is going to ruin me. I'm ruined!' 'Well, I hope you're all happy'--like, to no one in particular. . . . No one forced me to do this, but I kept acting like I had been forced to do it." The interviewer notes that "[s]he decided to write a memoir, she said, after considering book offers for years; turning 40 made a difference. 'I felt like, I guess I've lived long enough to have some experiences,' she said, with no hint of underembellishment."

Some reviewers have questioned whether Bossypants is really a memoir. While Fey does tell readers some revealing stories, she does not attempt to tell us the full story of her life. What is her purpose in sharing this book with us in what she calls her "last five minutes" of fame? And how does her particular style of deflective humor support this purpose better than a more traditional and "serious" memoir might have?

As Craig Wilson said of Bossypants in USA Today, "It's not every day you read something that makes you laugh out loud every other page. Then again, Tina Fey doesn't write a book every day." So we hope you will read this book and join the discussion: Tuesday, April 3, at 6:30 p.m. at Main Library; Thursday, April 19, at 11:00 a.m. at West Ashley Branch Library, and here on the blog.

March Notfiction Book Discussions

How does one write a biography of a woman from whom, at best, only one written word survives? Whose story we know from sources who never knew her? Whose political rivals shaped her story for their own benefit? A woman whom we think we know today from salacious depictions in film and literature?

Cleopatra: A Life by Stacy Schiff acknowledges that Cleopatra "seems the joint creation of Roman propagandists and Hollywood directors," yet Pulitzer Prize-winning biographer Schiff takes on the daunting task of discovering who she really was. Schiff notes that "[t]o restore Cleopatra is as much to salvage the few facts as to peel away the encrusted myth and the hoary propaganda." Schiff returns to the classical sources, carefully separating fact from fiction, helping us understand the varied perspectives of Cleopatra's biographers over the centuries, emancipating the Egyptian queen from the stereotype of seductress and restoring the true story of her political acumen in the glittering and treacherous world of Ptolemaic Egypt.

According to biographer Joseph J. Ellis, "It is a beautiful pairing--the most alluring and elusive woman in recorded history, and one of the most gifted biographers of our time. Style, like leadership, is difficult to define, but we know it when we see it. We see it here on every page."

To view images of Cleopatra as she has been imagined through the ages, read Goddess, Queen, Celebrity: 11 Iconic Images of Cleopatra and Why They're Wrong, an essay with photographs by Stacy Schiff in Huffington Post (2010) and All Hail Cleopatra !, a review with photographs by Michael Korda in The Daily Beast (2010).

We hope you will join the discussion: Tuesday, March 6, at Main Library at 6:30 p.m.; Thursday, March 22, at West Ashley Branch Library at 11:00 a.m.; and here on the blog.

February Not Fiction Book Discussions

Last month, we read a biography of Michel de Montaigne, who created the genre of writing we know as the personal essay. Montaigne wrote as an attempt to discover what he thought and felt about the world around him. This month, we will discuss Pulphead: Essays by John Jeremiah Sullivan, which continues, over 400 years later, in the spirit of that tradition.

Sullivan, a writer for GQ, The New York Times Magazine, Harper's Magazine, and others, has been called by his peers one of the best essayists of his generation, a "writer's-writer's writer." In Pulphead, Sullivan gathers together deeply researched and reported essays on American culture, "popular, unpopular, and at times completely forgotten" (book jacket)--think Axl Rose and Michael Jackson, but also think Andrew Lytle, last of the Southern Agrarians, and Constantine Rafinesque, 19th century naturalist. Inserting himself as a character in most of the essays, Sullivan writes with humor, curiosity, and, most of all, empathy for his subjects' personal sense of purpose and dignity. Through this character's great interest in the world around him, especially those people and events we think we understand but do not, or those people and events that might otherwise be forgotten, we as readers are drawn to consider his subjects with fresh eyes and an open mind. What picture of us as culture do the essays present? And what purpose does Sullivan's persona serve in guiding us on this tour?

Watch a CBS News Author Talk interview with Sullivan in which he talks about the effects of his recent success on his writing, David Foster Wallace, Faulkner, and what he's working on now.

We hope you will join the discussion: Tuesday, February 7, at 6:30 p.m. at Main Library; Thursday, February 23, at 11:00 a.m. at West Ashley Branch Library; and here on the blog.

January Not Fiction Book Discussions

We begin a new year of discussions with a book likely to make you question the tradition of making New Year's resolutions: Sarah Bakewell's How to Live--Or--A Life of Montaigne in One Question and Twenty Attempts at an Answer.

Michel Eyquem de Montaigne, a Renaissance nobleman, public official, and winegrower, wondered about such things as how to get along with people and how to adjust to the loss of someone you love--essentially, how to live. He explored these questions in a new form of writing for the time that he called essays, meaning attempts at understanding. He gave these digressive and personal essays titles like Of Friendship, How We Laugh and Cry for the Same Thing, Of Thumbs, How Our Mind Hinders Itself, Of Experience.

Sarah Bakewell discovered Montaigne serendipitously, as the only book available in English to while away the time on a train ride in Budapest. Her biography conveys her great affection and admiration for Montaigne, telling the story of his colorful life through the questions he posed and the answers he and his readers over the past four centuries have found in his companionable, witty, and wise writing.

Bakewell says in her Acknowledgements that discovering Montaigne's essays taught her "the Montaignean truth that the best things in life happen when you don't get what you think you want." If this is true, then what does this mean for those often guilt-inducing New Year's resolutions and the bigger question, always hovering over all we do, of how to live? In an article Bakewell wrote for The Independent that was published January 1, 2010, she suggests that Montaigne would tell us not to make resolutions. "He did think, though, that valuable lessons could be learned from looking over a life and taking a longer perspective. Instead of clean breaks and new intentions, what Montaigne sought in his past experience was greater self-understanding. There would always be puzzling areas, but he tried to become familiar with his weaknesses so as to work around them. . . . . This is very different from making resolutions. It does not mean rejecting past actions, but accepting and even embracing them in order to become what Montaigne calls 'wise at our own expense.'"

We hope you will join the discussion as we take Montaigne as our guide: Tuesday, January 3, at 6:30 p.m. at Main Library; Thursday, January 19, at 11:00 a.m. at West Ashley Branch Library; and here on the blog.

Not Fiction Book Discussions List for 2012

We are excited to post the list of titles for 2012, a selection of recent memoirs and biographies!

Why do we love to read about the lives of others? Is it idle curiosity? Wishful thinking? Envy? Schadenfreude? Or are we hoping for ideas for how--or not--to live our own lives?

Sarah Bakewell, the author of our January book, How to Live--Or--A Life of Montaigne in One Question and Twenty Attempts at an Answer, notes that Michel Eyquem de Montaigne, a nobleman, government official, and winegrower who lived in France in the 1500s, invented the memoir as we know it and laid the groundwork for blogging, Facebooking, Twittering, talk shows and reality TV, celebrity biopics, and all of the other ways we satisfy the urge to talk about ourselves and satisfy our curiosity about others. Montaigne believed that "each man bears the entire form of the human condition," and that we can understand more about ourselves by contemplating the lives of others. So that will be our task in 2012.

For the complete list of titles, see the right side of this page.

And don't forget the December 2011 discussions of Eaarth: Making a Life on a Tough New Planet by Bill McKibben: Tonight, Tuesday, December 6, at 6:30 p.m. at Main Library and Thursday, December 22, at 11:00 a.m. at West Ashley Branch Library.

December Not Fiction Book Discussions

In this year's discussions, we have explored our understanding of our world--our world view--and how it affects the uses we make of the earth, our wanderings across it, our settlements on it, our confrontations with the elements and animals that inhabit it, and our confrontations with each other. For our final book of 2011, Eaarth: Making a Life on a Tough New Planet by Bill McKibben, we will take a wide-angle view of the entire planet and consider McKibben's argument that what we do locally really does matter globally.

In 1989, McKibben wrote The End of Nature, widely regarded as the first book for a general audience to address the possible effects of global warming. In Eaarth--note the extra "a"--he argues that we have waited too long to address climate change, that we have created a new planet that is fundamentally different from the one we have known. Many of his predictions are now a reality, as he summarizes on his website on the page titled From the End of Nature to the Beginning of Eaarth.

While McKibben intends for his book to be sobering, he also hopes to rally readers with practical suggestions for how to build civil and sustainable societies and economies. His most world-view-challenging argument is that endless economic growth is not only unsustainable but also unnecessary to our well being and happiness. And he believes passionately in the value of individual effort. He is a founder of the grassroots climate campaign 350.org, which has coordinated 15,000 rallies in 189 countries since 2009 with the goal of creating awareness of the need to reduce the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere from its current level of 392 parts per million (ppm) to 350 ppm.

What do you think? We didn't pay attention 20 years ago, and we are all too willing to consider the arguments of those who claim climate change is not driven by human behavior. Why is it so difficult to shift our understanding on this issue to the point that we take action? Will our individual and communal actions be enough? Can we ethically require the same actions from developing countries that have not had the chance to create a materially more comfortable life through economic growth? As Paul Greenberg, writing for the New York Times Sunday Book Review, notes, "in the absence of some overarching authority, a kind of ecologically minded Lenin, [these solutions] will remain hipster lifestyle choices rather than global game changers. Which I suppose in the end is part of McKibben's point. Eaarth itself will be that ecological Lenin, a harsh environmental dictator that will force us to bend to new rules. The question is whether we will be smart enough to bend ourselves first."

We hope you will join the discussion: Tuesday, December 6, at 6:30 at Main Library; Thursday, December 22, at 11:00 a.m. at West Ashley Branch Library; and here on the blog.